02 · Neurotechnology

Decoding the Silent Mind.

Non-invasive brain-to-language for the unspeaking · Research proposal

Recent work has shown AI systems that interpret the vocalisations of animals. The far more consequential frontier is the inverse-facing one: people who have language but have lost the channel to express it.

wrist · HRV · skin-conductance
context · calm
EEG cap → signal → decoder → assembled words. Wrist biosignals run in parallel as a context channel.

The problem

Millions live with intact cognition but a broken output channel: locked-in syndrome, late-stage ALS, post-stroke aphasia, severe cerebral palsy, minimally-verbal autism. The bottleneck is not thought — it is the motor pathway between thought and speech. Eye-gaze keyboards and switch scanning are slow, fatiguing, and degrade as the condition progresses.

State of the art — and where it stops

Invasive BCIs (Neuralink; Stanford's Willett lab) reach the highest accuracy. Stanford has decoded inner speech — silent, unspoken language — from implanted motor-cortex arrays, hitting ~74% accuracy against a ~125,000-word vocabulary. Powerful, but it requires neurosurgery.

Non-invasive EEG decoding (DeWave; Meta's EEG-to-text work) skips surgery entirely: a snug sensor cap reads scalp signals, and a model paired with an LLM translates patterns into words.

Invasive
~74% accuracy
High signal · neurosurgery required · does not scale
Non-invasive · our focus
Lab-bound, but accessible
Snug cap · no surgery · accuracy fragile in the field

The gap is sharp: invasive wins on accuracy but cannot scale; non-invasive is accessible but remains lab-bound — fragile across people, sessions, and electrical environments. Almost nothing addresses messy real-world deployment.

Our distinct angle — robustness, not raw accuracy

We do not try to out-accuracy Neuralink. We make non-invasive brain-to-text actually work outside the lab.

Why now

Next · 03 — Beyond the Interface